|
Chipped front teeth at age 8, 2006. The pieces were glued back the next day at UCSF.
|
|
This is Sam, at 11 years and 3 months, and his teeth, on 5/12/2009
12/9/10 - Sam 12 years and 10 months
12/28/2010 - Sam 12 years 10 months
'Full Mouth x-rays' (periapicals + bitewings) by C-Dental in Menlo Park = 190 µSiv (each one is 9.5 MSiv)
(About $150)
'Full Mouth x-rays' (periapicals + bitewings) by C-Dental in Menlo Park = 190 µSiv (each one is 9.5 MSiv)
(About $150)
Sam on Jan 17 2014
Sam on July 15, 2014
|
| ||
PANORAMA/ PANOGRAM /PANOGRAPH/PANOREX (26 microsieverts =µSiv )
9/24/08
December 2010
April 2012, Sam age 14.
Orthodontist # 1 concludes that 6 months of traction has had no effect. He cuts the chains and gives us a referral for extraction.
September 2012, after surgery #2
CBCT ( August 2013) derived panorama.
1/17/2014: image requested by Dr Becker.
According to UCSF Dr Nelson,comparing CBCT May 2012 and Sep 2013, the lower canine had moved 3-4 mm. Dr Nelson gave up traction on the lower canine
Nov 22, 2013, after he said it had only moved 1/2 mm over 3 months.
Post surgery #3, March 6th, 2014
CEPHALOGRAM
|
CBCT #1 May 2012 and #2 August 2013
(25 µSv for 2012 and 15 µSv for 2013)
(25 µSv for 2012 and 15 µSv for 2013)
CBCT May 2012
(Above images provided by #2 orthodontist, he did not show us any manipulations or other views, just commented that it looked like there was a window in the bone for the canines to emerge through).
The red marking is the inferior alveolar nerve - a computer aided estimate
The red marking is the inferior alveolar nerve - a computer aided estimate
|
|
Compare: May 2012 - August 2013
|
Compare: May 2012 - August 2013
|
Superimposed images:
the white is May 2012, the blue is August 2013
|
Superimposed images: the white is
May 2012, the blue is September 2013
|
CBCT #3: March 17, 2015
In vivo Dental Anatomage * analysis of the 3/17/2015 CBCT done by specialist in Israel
UPPER CANINE - PA= PERIAPICAL (1.65 micro sieverts AT UCSF, 9.5 µSiv at C-Dental)
(A real peri-apical should include the root part, 'peri' = around, 'apical' = tip)
(A real peri-apical should include the root part, 'peri' = around, 'apical' = tip)
|
|
March 2013
|
6/21/2013
unfortunately, view does not include
the lateral incisor
|
1/17/2014
|
|
Jerusalem, March 6, 2014
LOWER CANINE
|
|
November 2012
|
|
1/17/2014
|
1/17/2014
|
Jerusalem, March 6, 2014
|
CDental, San Mateo: TMJ CBCT
9/13/2016, $515
15 x 15 standard 112 µSv + 15 x 15 ecco (open mouth) 72 µSv
9/13/2016, $515
15 x 15 standard 112 µSv + 15 x 15 ecco (open mouth) 72 µSv
| 2016-09-13_bower_samuel_-_beamreaders_report.pdf |
12/15/2017: Extraction #6, bonegrafting
|
|
Sam and Sievert (µSiv)
Pano (25) Full mouth PA (2-9.5) CBCT Cefalo µSiv
2010 1 x 25 = 25 190 2x2=4 219
2011 4x2=8 8
2012 2 x 25 = 50 2x2=4 25 79
2013 4x2=8 15 23
2014 4 x 25 = 100 6x2=12, 2x9.5=19 5(?) 136
Dr Schendel's x-ray, non-digital = 10 10
2015 160 160
2016 24 112 + 72 5 + 5 218
2017 5 5
2018 1203 (sic!) 1203
_____
758 + 1203
1 mSv = 1000 µSiv
* The Anatomage company is located in San Jose in the Bay Area. An Anatomodel of Sam teeth was suggested by Dr Eraso of Beamreaders in November of 2013 to Dr Nelson, but he never followed up on it. It's funny that their
software would be used 2 years later in Israel.
software would be used 2 years later in Israel.